summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cmd/Makefile
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-03-15efi_loader: Add "bootefi" commandAlexander Graf
In order to execute an EFI application, we need to bridge the gap between U-Boot's notion of executing images and EFI's notion of doing the same. The best path forward IMHO here is to stick completely to the way U-Boot deals with payloads. You manually load them using whatever method to RAM and then have a simple boot command to execute them. So in our case, you would do # load mmc 0:1 $loadaddr grub.efi # bootefi $loadaddr which then gets you into a grub shell. Fdt information known to U-boot via the fdt addr command is also passed to the EFI payload. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> [trini: Guard help text with CONFIG_SYS_LONGHELP] Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2016-01-25Remove the cmd_ prefix from command filesSimon Glass
Now that they are in their own directory, we can remove this prefix. This makes it easier to find a file since the prefix does not get in the way. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
2016-01-25Move all command code into its own directorySimon Glass
There are a lot of unrelated files in common, including all of the commands. Moving them into their own directory makes them easier to find and is more logical. Some commands include non-command code, such as cmd_scsi.c. This should be sorted out at some point so that the function can be enabled with or without the associated command. Unfortunately, with m68k I get this error: m68k: + M5329AFEE +arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.o: In function `_start': +arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.S:159:(.text+0x452): relocation truncated to fit: R_68K_PC16 against symbol `board_init_f' defined in .text.board_init_f section in common/built-in.o I hope someone can shed some light on what this means. I hope it isn't depending on the position of code in the image. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>