From 75ef09d0d119e031cc90e8a5cc4d0fe2ae4701ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Stuebner Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:12:02 +0200 Subject: spl: separate SPL_FRAMEWORK config for spl and tpl Right now enabling SPL_FRAMEWORK will also enable it for the TPL in all cases, making the TPL bigger. There may be cases where the TPL is really size constrained due to its underlying ram size. Therefore introduce a new TPL_FRAMEWORK option and make the relevant conditionals check for both. The default is set to "y if SPL_FRAMEWORK" to mimic the previous behaviour where the TPL would always get the SPL framework if it was enabled in SPL. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner --- arch/arm/lib/crt0.S | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/lib/crt0.S') diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/crt0.S b/arch/arm/lib/crt0.S index c74641dcd9..fb6c37cf51 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/crt0.S +++ b/arch/arm/lib/crt0.S @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ here: bl c_runtime_cpu_setup /* we still call old routine here */ #endif -#if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK) +#if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) || CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FRAMEWORK) #if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_EARLY_BSS) SPL_CLEAR_BSS -- cgit v1.2.3