From 74cbb754d63f5b18e9f41332ff947ff6bd2834eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:35:32 +0100 Subject: perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback commit 81ec3f3c4c4d78f2d3b6689c9816bfbdf7417dbb upstream. Vince (and later on Ravi) reported crashes in the BTS code during fuzzing with the following backtrace: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI ... RIP: 0010:perf_prepare_sample+0x8f/0x510 ... Call Trace: ? intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer+0x194/0x230 intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer+0x160/0x230 ? tick_nohz_irq_exit+0x31/0x40 ? smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x48/0xe0 ? call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 ? call_function_single_interrupt+0xa/0x20 ? x86_schedule_events+0x1a0/0x2f0 ? x86_pmu_commit_txn+0xb4/0x100 ? find_busiest_group+0x47/0x5d0 ? perf_event_set_state.part.42+0x12/0x50 ? perf_mux_hrtimer_restart+0x40/0xb0 intel_pmu_disable_event+0xae/0x100 ? intel_pmu_disable_event+0xae/0x100 x86_pmu_stop+0x7a/0xb0 x86_pmu_del+0x57/0x120 event_sched_out.isra.101+0x83/0x180 group_sched_out.part.103+0x57/0xe0 ctx_sched_out+0x188/0x240 ctx_resched+0xa8/0xd0 __perf_event_enable+0x193/0x1e0 event_function+0x8e/0xc0 remote_function+0x41/0x50 flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x68/0x100 generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x13/0x30 smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x3e/0xe0 call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 The reason is that while event init code does several checks for BTS events and prevents several unwanted config bits for BTS event (like precise_ip), the PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD allows to create BTS event without those checks being done. Following sequence will cause the crash: If we create an 'almost' BTS event with precise_ip and callchains, and it into a BTS event it will crash the perf_prepare_sample() function because precise_ip events are expected to come in with callchain data initialized, but that's not the case for intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer() caller. Adding a check_period callback to be called before the period is changed via PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD. It will deny the change if the event would become BTS. Plus adding also the limit_period check as well. Reported-by: Vince Weaver Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Naveen N. Rao Cc: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190204123532.GA4794@krava Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/events/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 5a97f34bc14c..4fb9d5054618 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4963,6 +4963,11 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, } } +static int perf_event_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value) +{ + return event->pmu->check_period(event, value); +} + static int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 __user *arg) { u64 value; @@ -4979,6 +4984,9 @@ static int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 __user *arg) if (event->attr.freq && value > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate) return -EINVAL; + if (perf_event_check_period(event, value)) + return -EINVAL; + event_function_call(event, __perf_event_period, &value); return 0; @@ -9362,6 +9370,11 @@ static int perf_pmu_nop_int(struct pmu *pmu) return 0; } +static int perf_event_nop_int(struct perf_event *event, u64 value) +{ + return 0; +} + static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nop_txn_flags); static void perf_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu, unsigned int flags) @@ -9662,6 +9675,9 @@ got_cpu_context: pmu->pmu_disable = perf_pmu_nop_void; } + if (!pmu->check_period) + pmu->check_period = perf_event_nop_int; + if (!pmu->event_idx) pmu->event_idx = perf_event_idx_default; -- cgit v1.2.3