From 3cdeda1e763ccb2287c6ee76ece14145027653a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:39:56 -0400 Subject: timekeeping: Add missing update call in timekeeping_resume() This is a backport of 3e997130bd2e8c6f5aaa49d6e3161d4d29b43ab0 The leap second rework unearthed another issue of inconsistent data. On timekeeping_resume() the timekeeper data is updated, but nothing calls timekeeping_update(), so now the update code in the timer interrupt sees stale values. This has been the case before those changes, but then the timer interrupt was using stale data as well so this went unnoticed for quite some time. Add the missing update call, so all the data is consistent everywhere. Reported-by: Andreas Schwab Reported-and-tested-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Steigerwald Cc: John Stultz Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Cc: Prarit Bhargava Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index 62e12c354ef9..7c50de83b6fd 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -719,6 +719,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void) timekeeper.clock->cycle_last = timekeeper.clock->read(timekeeper.clock); timekeeper.ntp_error = 0; timekeeping_suspended = 0; + timekeeping_update(false); write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper.lock, flags); touch_softlockup_watchdog(); -- cgit v1.2.3