1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
//===- BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp - BranchProbabilityInfo unit tests ---===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
#include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
#include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h"
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
namespace llvm {
namespace {
struct BranchProbabilityInfoTest : public testing::Test {
std::unique_ptr<BranchProbabilityInfo> BPI;
std::unique_ptr<DominatorTree> DT;
std::unique_ptr<LoopInfo> LI;
LLVMContext C;
BranchProbabilityInfo &buildBPI(Function &F) {
DT.reset(new DominatorTree(F));
LI.reset(new LoopInfo(*DT));
BPI.reset(new BranchProbabilityInfo(F, *LI));
return *BPI;
}
std::unique_ptr<Module> makeLLVMModule() {
const char *ModuleString = "define void @f() { exit: ret void }\n";
SMDiagnostic Err;
return parseAssemblyString(ModuleString, Err, C);
}
};
TEST_F(BranchProbabilityInfoTest, StressUnreachableHeuristic) {
auto M = makeLLVMModule();
Function *F = M->getFunction("f");
// define void @f() {
// entry:
// switch i32 undef, label %exit, [
// i32 0, label %preexit
// ... ;;< Add lots of cases to stress the heuristic.
// ]
// preexit:
// unreachable
// exit:
// ret void
// }
auto *ExitBB = &F->back();
auto *EntryBB = BasicBlock::Create(C, "entry", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
auto *PreExitBB =
BasicBlock::Create(C, "preexit", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
new UnreachableInst(C, PreExitBB);
unsigned NumCases = 4096;
auto *I32 = IntegerType::get(C, 32);
auto *Undef = UndefValue::get(I32);
auto *Switch = SwitchInst::Create(Undef, ExitBB, NumCases, EntryBB);
for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumCases; ++I)
Switch->addCase(ConstantInt::get(I32, I), PreExitBB);
BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI = buildBPI(*F);
// FIXME: This doesn't seem optimal. Since all of the cases handled by the
// switch have the *same* destination block ("preexit"), shouldn't it be the
// hot one? I'd expect the results to be reversed here...
EXPECT_FALSE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, PreExitBB));
EXPECT_TRUE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, ExitBB));
}
} // end anonymous namespace
} // end namespace llvm
|
