summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/utils/kate
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-08-05Rename all references to old mailing lists to new lists.llvm.org address.Tanya Lattner
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@243999 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-13Remove the linker_private and linker_private_weak linkages.Rafael Espindola
These linkages were introduced some time ago, but it was never very clear what exactly their semantics were or what they should be used for. Some investigation found these uses: * utf-16 strings in clang. * non-unnamed_addr strings produced by the sanitizers. It turns out they were just working around a more fundamental problem. For some sections a MachO linker needs a symbol in order to split the section into atoms, and llvm had no idea that was the case. I fixed that in r201700 and it is now safe to use the private linkage. When the object ends up in a section that requires symbols, llvm will use a 'l' prefix instead of a 'L' prefix and things just work. With that, these linkages were already dead, but there was a potential future user in the objc metadata information. I am still looking at CGObjcMac.cpp, but at this point I am convinced that linker_private and linker_private_weak are not what they need. The objc uses are currently split in * Regular symbols (no '\01' prefix). LLVM already directly provides whatever semantics they need. * Uses of a private name (start with "\01L" or "\01l") and private linkage. We can drop the "\01L" and "\01l" prefixes as soon as llvm agrees with clang on L being ok or not for a given section. I have two patches in code review for this. * Uses of private name and weak linkage. The last case is the one that one could think would fit one of these linkages. That is not the case. The semantics are * the linker will merge these symbol by *name*. * the linker will hide them in the final DSO. Given that the merging is done by name, any of the private (or internal) linkages would be a bad match. They allow llvm to rename the symbols, and that is really not what we want. From the llvm point of view, these objects should really be (linkonce|weak)(_odr)?. For now, just keeping the "\01l" prefix is probably the best for these symbols. If we one day want to have a more direct support in llvm, IMHO what we should add is not a linkage, it is just a hidden_symbol attribute. It would be applicable to multiple linkages. For example, on weak it would produce the current behavior we have for objc metadata. On internal, it would be equivalent to private (and we should then remove private). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203866 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-11-15Add addrspacecast instruction.Matt Arsenault
Patch by Michele Scandale! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194760 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-11-01Remove linkonce_odr_auto_hide.Rafael Espindola
linkonce_odr_auto_hide was in incomplete attempt to implement a way for the linker to hide symbols that are known to be available in every TU and whose addresses are not relevant for a particular DSO. It was redundant in that it all its uses are equivalent to linkonce_odr+unnamed_addr. Unlike those, it has never been connected to clang or llvm's optimizers, so it was effectively dead. Given that nothing produces it, this patch just nukes it (other than the llvm-c enum value). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193865 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-08-23Add function attribute 'optnone'.Andrea Di Biagio
This function attribute indicates that the function is not optimized by any optimization or code generator passes with the exception of interprocedural optimization passes. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189101 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-23Add the IR attribute 'sspstrong'.Bill Wendling
SSPStrong applies a heuristic to insert stack protectors in these situations: * A Protector is required for functions which contain an array, regardless of type or length. * A Protector is required for functions which contain a structure/union which contains an array, regardless of type or length. Note, there is no limit to the depth of nesting. * A protector is required when the address of a local variable (i.e., stack based variable) is exposed. (E.g., such as through a local whose address is taken as part of the RHS of an assignment or a local whose address is taken as part of a function argument.) This patch implements the SSPString attribute to be equivalent to SSPRequired. This will change in a subsequent patch. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-10-09syntax-highlighting: Fix module asm keyword.Michael J. Spencer
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@116152 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-10-09Add Kate syntax highlighting files.Michael J. Spencer
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@116146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8