summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/TableGen
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders@apple.com>2017-07-27 11:03:45 +0000
committerDaniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders@apple.com>2017-07-27 11:03:45 +0000
commite0714cfc0fecd4a47349ffc676f1d91c03eb4e1c (patch)
treede0a0810b0910a78acce0e2defa9bb45419ab9c0 /test/TableGen
parentbe73cbb584301b05ccd9bba22bb210a0f3f595de (diff)
Re-commit: r309094 [globalisel][tablegen] Fuse the generated tables together.
Summary: Now that we have control flow in place, fuse the per-rule tables into a single table. This is a compile-time saving at this point. However, this will also enable the optimization of a table so that similar instructions can be tested together, reducing the time spent on the matching the code. This is NFC in terms of externally visible behaviour but some internals have changed slightly. State.MIs is no longer reset between each rule that is attempted because it's not necessary to do so. As a consequence of this the restriction on the order that instructions are added to State.MIs has been relaxed to only affect recorded instructions that require new elements to be added to the vector. GIM_RecordInsn can now write to any element from 1 to State.MIs.size() instead of just State.MIs.size(). The compile-time regressions from the last commit were caused by the ARM target including a non-const variable (zero_reg) in the table and therefore generating an initializer for it. That variable is now const. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar Reviewed By: rovka Subscribers: kristof.beyls, igorb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35681 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309264 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/TableGen')
-rw-r--r--test/TableGen/GlobalISelEmitter.td200
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 165 deletions
diff --git a/test/TableGen/GlobalISelEmitter.td b/test/TableGen/GlobalISelEmitter.td
index fa9db0260a0..8c32615fe08 100644
--- a/test/TableGen/GlobalISelEmitter.td
+++ b/test/TableGen/GlobalISelEmitter.td
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ def HasC : Predicate<"Subtarget->hasC()"> { let RecomputePerFunction = 1; }
//
// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable0[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/4,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_SELECT,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -121,14 +121,7 @@ def HasC : Predicate<"Subtarget->hasC()"> { let RecomputePerFunction = 1; }
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable0\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable0, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
def INSN3 : I<(outs GPR32:$dst),
(ins GPR32Op:$src1, complex:$src2, GPR32:$src3, complex:$src4, complex:$src5), []>;
@@ -138,8 +131,7 @@ def : Pat<(select GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2, (select GPR32:$src3, complex:$src4
//===- Test a pattern with multiple ComplexPattern operands. --------------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable1[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 1*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/4,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_RecordInsn, /*DefineMI*/1, /*MI*/0, /*OpIdx*/3, // MIs[1]
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/1, /*Expected*/4,
@@ -180,14 +172,7 @@ def : Pat<(select GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2, (select GPR32:$src3, complex:$src4
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable1\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable1, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 1: @[[LABEL]]
def : GINodeEquiv<G_SELECT, select>;
def INSN2 : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32Op:$src1, complex:$src2, complex:$src3), []>;
@@ -196,8 +181,7 @@ def : Pat<(select GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2, complex:$src3),
//===- Test a simple pattern with regclass operands. ----------------------===//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable2[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 2*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_ADD,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -213,14 +197,7 @@ def : Pat<(select GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2, complex:$src3),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_MutateOpcode, /*InsnID*/0, /*RecycleInsnID*/0, /*Opcode*/MyTarget::ADD,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable2\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable2, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 2: @[[LABEL]]
def ADD : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2),
[(set GPR32:$dst, (add GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2))]>;
@@ -228,8 +205,7 @@ def ADD : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2),
//===- Test a simple pattern with an intrinsic. ---------------------------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable3[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 3*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_INTRINSIC,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -249,22 +225,14 @@ def ADD : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable3\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable3, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 3: @[[LABEL]]
def MOV : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1),
[(set GPR32:$dst, (int_mytarget_nop GPR32:$src1))]>;
//===- Test a nested instruction match. -----------------------------------===//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable4[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 4*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckFeatures, GIFBS_HasA,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_RecordInsn, /*DefineMI*/1, /*MI*/0, /*OpIdx*/1, // MIs[1]
@@ -298,18 +266,10 @@ def MOV : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable4\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable4, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 4: @[[LABEL]]
// We also get a second rule by commutativity.
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable5[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 5*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckFeatures, GIFBS_HasA,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_RecordInsn, /*DefineMI*/1, /*MI*/0, /*OpIdx*/2,
@@ -343,14 +303,7 @@ def MOV : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable5\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable5, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 5: @[[LABEL]]
def MULADD : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src3),
[(set GPR32:$dst,
@@ -359,8 +312,7 @@ def MULADD : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src3),
//===- Test another simple pattern with regclass operands. ----------------===//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable6[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 6*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckFeatures, GIFBS_HasA_HasB_HasC,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_MUL,
@@ -382,14 +334,7 @@ def MULADD : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src3),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable6\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable6, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 6: @[[LABEL]]
def MUL : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
[(set GPR32:$dst, (mul GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2))]>,
@@ -397,8 +342,7 @@ def MUL : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
//===- Test a more complex multi-instruction match. -----------------------===//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable7[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 7*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckFeatures, GIFBS_HasA,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_RecordInsn, /*DefineMI*/1, /*MI*/0, /*OpIdx*/1, // MIs[1]
@@ -444,14 +388,7 @@ def MUL : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable7\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable7, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 7: @[[LABEL]]
def INSNBOB : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src3, GPR32:$src4),
[(set GPR32:$dst,
@@ -461,8 +398,7 @@ def INSNBOB : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src3, G
//===- Test a pattern with ComplexPattern operands. -----------------------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable8[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 8*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_SUB,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -483,14 +419,7 @@ def INSNBOB : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2, GPR32:$src3, G
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable8\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable8, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 8: @[[LABEL]]
def INSN1 : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2), []>;
def : Pat<(sub GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2), (INSN1 GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2)>;
@@ -498,8 +427,7 @@ def : Pat<(sub GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2), (INSN1 GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2)>;
//===- Test a simple pattern with a default operand. ----------------------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable9[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 9*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_XOR,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -520,14 +448,7 @@ def : Pat<(sub GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2), (INSN1 GPR32:$src1, complex:$src2)>;
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable9\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable9, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 9: @[[LABEL]]
// The -2 is just to distinguish it from the 'not' case below.
def XORI : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
@@ -536,8 +457,7 @@ def XORI : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
//===- Test a simple pattern with a default register operand. -------------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable10[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 10*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_XOR,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -558,14 +478,7 @@ def XORI : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable10\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable10, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 10: @[[LABEL]]
// The -3 is just to distinguish it from the 'not' case below and the other default op case above.
def XOR : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
@@ -574,8 +487,7 @@ def XOR : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
//===- Test a simple pattern with a multiple default operands. ------------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable11[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 11*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_XOR,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -597,14 +509,7 @@ def XOR : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable11\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable11, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 11: @[[LABEL]]
// The -4 is just to distinguish it from the other 'not' cases.
def XORlike : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
@@ -613,8 +518,7 @@ def XORlike : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
//===- Test a simple pattern with multiple operands with defaults. --------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable12[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 12*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_XOR,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -637,14 +541,7 @@ def XORlike : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable12\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable12, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 12: @[[LABEL]]
// The -5 is just to distinguish it from the other cases.
def XORManyDefaults : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1Z:$src3, Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1),
@@ -655,8 +552,7 @@ def XORManyDefaults : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1Z:$src3, Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1)
// This must precede the 3-register variants because constant immediates have
// priority over register banks.
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable13[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 13*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/3,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_XOR,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -677,14 +573,7 @@ def XORManyDefaults : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins m1Z:$src3, Z:$src2, GPR32:$src1)
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable13\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable13, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 13: @[[LABEL]]
def ORN : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins GPR32:$src1, GPR32:$src2), []>;
def : Pat<(not GPR32:$Wm), (ORN R0, GPR32:$Wm)>;
@@ -692,8 +581,7 @@ def : Pat<(not GPR32:$Wm), (ORN R0, GPR32:$Wm)>;
//===- Test a COPY_TO_REGCLASS --------------------------------------------===//
//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable14[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 14*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/2,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_BITCAST,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -706,22 +594,14 @@ def : Pat<(not GPR32:$Wm), (ORN R0, GPR32:$Wm)>;
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_MutateOpcode, /*InsnID*/0, /*RecycleInsnID*/0, /*Opcode*/TargetOpcode::COPY,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainOperandRC, /*InsnID*/0, /*Op*/0, /*RC GPR32*/1,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable14\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable14, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 14: @[[LABEL]]
def : Pat<(i32 (bitconvert FPR32:$src1)),
(COPY_TO_REGCLASS FPR32:$src1, GPR32)>;
//===- Test a simple pattern with just a leaf immediate. ------------------===//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable15[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 15*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/2,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_CONSTANT,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] dst
@@ -736,21 +616,13 @@ def : Pat<(i32 (bitconvert FPR32:$src1)),
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_EraseFromParent, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
-// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable15\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable15, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
-// CHECK-NEXT: }
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 15: @[[LABEL]]
def MOV1 : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins), [(set GPR32:$dst, 1)]>;
//===- Test a pattern with an MBB operand. --------------------------------===//
-// CHECK-LABEL: MatchTable16[] = {
-// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 0*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
+// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Try, /*On fail goto*//*Label 16*/ [[LABEL:[0-9]+]],
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckNumOperands, /*MI*/0, /*Expected*/1,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_CheckOpcode, /*MI*/0, TargetOpcode::G_BR,
// CHECK-NEXT: // MIs[0] target
@@ -759,12 +631,10 @@ def MOV1 : I<(outs GPR32:$dst), (ins), [(set GPR32:$dst, 1)]>;
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_MutateOpcode, /*InsnID*/0, /*RecycleInsnID*/0, /*Opcode*/MyTarget::BR,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands, /*InsnID*/0,
// CHECK-NEXT: GIR_Done,
-// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 0: @[[LABEL]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: // Label 16: @[[LABEL]]
// CHECK-NEXT: GIM_Reject,
// CHECK-NEXT: };
-// CHECK-NEXT: MIs.resize(1);
-// CHECK-NEXT: DEBUG(dbgs() << "Processing MatchTable16\n");
-// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable16, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
+// CHECK-NEXT: if (executeMatchTable(*this, OutMIs, State, MatcherInfo, MatchTable0, TII, MRI, TRI, RBI, AvailableFeatures)) {
// CHECK-NEXT: return true;
// CHECK-NEXT: }