From 31de92e39bbeffb9f1641d292e94b48f70809ae1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Biener Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:07:06 +0000 Subject: tree-parloops.c (report_ploop_op): Copy from report_vect_op. 2019-09-18 Richard Biener * tree-parloops.c (report_ploop_op): Copy from report_vect_op. (parloops_valid_reduction_input_p): Copy from valid_reduction_input_p. (parloops_is_slp_reduction): Copy from vect_is_slp_reduction. (parloops_needs_fold_left_reduction_p): Copy from needs_fold_left_reduction_p. (parloops_is_simple_reduction): Copy from vect_is_simple_reduction. (parloops_force_simple_reduction): Copy from vect_force_simple_reduction. (gather_scalar_reductions): Adjust. * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_force_simple_reduction): Make static. * tree-vectorizer.h (vect_force_simple_reduction): Remove. From-SVN: r275896 --- gcc/tree-parloops.c | 726 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 719 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'gcc/tree-parloops.c') diff --git a/gcc/tree-parloops.c b/gcc/tree-parloops.c index f5cb411f087..b6bb49b2fa8 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-parloops.c +++ b/gcc/tree-parloops.c @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see More info can also be found at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AutoParInGCC */ /* Reduction handling: - currently we use vect_force_simple_reduction() to detect reduction patterns. + currently we use code inspired by vect_force_simple_reduction to detect + reduction patterns. The code transformation will be introduced by an example. @@ -182,6 +183,717 @@ parloop */ +/* Error reporting helper for parloops_is_simple_reduction below. GIMPLE + statement STMT is printed with a message MSG. */ + +static void +report_ploop_op (dump_flags_t msg_type, gimple *stmt, const char *msg) +{ + dump_printf_loc (msg_type, vect_location, "%s%G", msg, stmt); +} + +/* DEF_STMT_INFO occurs in a loop that contains a potential reduction + operation. Return true if the results of DEF_STMT_INFO are something + that can be accumulated by such a reduction. */ + +static bool +parloops_valid_reduction_input_p (stmt_vec_info def_stmt_info) +{ + return (is_gimple_assign (def_stmt_info->stmt) + || is_gimple_call (def_stmt_info->stmt) + || STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (def_stmt_info) == vect_induction_def + || (gimple_code (def_stmt_info->stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI + && STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (def_stmt_info) == vect_internal_def + && !is_loop_header_bb_p (gimple_bb (def_stmt_info->stmt)))); +} + +/* Detect SLP reduction of the form: + + #a1 = phi + a2 = operation (a1) + a3 = operation (a2) + a4 = operation (a3) + a5 = operation (a4) + + #a = phi + + PHI is the reduction phi node (#a1 = phi above) + FIRST_STMT is the first reduction stmt in the chain + (a2 = operation (a1)). + + Return TRUE if a reduction chain was detected. */ + +static bool +parloops_is_slp_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_info, gimple *phi, + gimple *first_stmt) +{ + class loop *loop = (gimple_bb (phi))->loop_father; + class loop *vect_loop = LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_info); + enum tree_code code; + gimple *loop_use_stmt = NULL; + stmt_vec_info use_stmt_info; + tree lhs; + imm_use_iterator imm_iter; + use_operand_p use_p; + int nloop_uses, size = 0, n_out_of_loop_uses; + bool found = false; + + if (loop != vect_loop) + return false; + + auto_vec reduc_chain; + lhs = PHI_RESULT (phi); + code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (first_stmt); + while (1) + { + nloop_uses = 0; + n_out_of_loop_uses = 0; + FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, imm_iter, lhs) + { + gimple *use_stmt = USE_STMT (use_p); + if (is_gimple_debug (use_stmt)) + continue; + + /* Check if we got back to the reduction phi. */ + if (use_stmt == phi) + { + loop_use_stmt = use_stmt; + found = true; + break; + } + + if (flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (use_stmt))) + { + loop_use_stmt = use_stmt; + nloop_uses++; + } + else + n_out_of_loop_uses++; + + /* There are can be either a single use in the loop or two uses in + phi nodes. */ + if (nloop_uses > 1 || (n_out_of_loop_uses && nloop_uses)) + return false; + } + + if (found) + break; + + /* We reached a statement with no loop uses. */ + if (nloop_uses == 0) + return false; + + /* This is a loop exit phi, and we haven't reached the reduction phi. */ + if (gimple_code (loop_use_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI) + return false; + + if (!is_gimple_assign (loop_use_stmt) + || code != gimple_assign_rhs_code (loop_use_stmt) + || !flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (loop_use_stmt))) + return false; + + /* Insert USE_STMT into reduction chain. */ + use_stmt_info = loop_info->lookup_stmt (loop_use_stmt); + reduc_chain.safe_push (use_stmt_info); + + lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (loop_use_stmt); + size++; + } + + if (!found || loop_use_stmt != phi || size < 2) + return false; + + /* Swap the operands, if needed, to make the reduction operand be the second + operand. */ + lhs = PHI_RESULT (phi); + for (unsigned i = 0; i < reduc_chain.length (); ++i) + { + gassign *next_stmt = as_a (reduc_chain[i]->stmt); + if (gimple_assign_rhs2 (next_stmt) == lhs) + { + tree op = gimple_assign_rhs1 (next_stmt); + stmt_vec_info def_stmt_info = loop_info->lookup_def (op); + + /* Check that the other def is either defined in the loop + ("vect_internal_def"), or it's an induction (defined by a + loop-header phi-node). */ + if (def_stmt_info + && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def_stmt_info->stmt)) + && parloops_valid_reduction_input_p (def_stmt_info)) + { + lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (next_stmt); + continue; + } + + return false; + } + else + { + tree op = gimple_assign_rhs2 (next_stmt); + stmt_vec_info def_stmt_info = loop_info->lookup_def (op); + + /* Check that the other def is either defined in the loop + ("vect_internal_def"), or it's an induction (defined by a + loop-header phi-node). */ + if (def_stmt_info + && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def_stmt_info->stmt)) + && parloops_valid_reduction_input_p (def_stmt_info)) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, "swapping oprnds: %G", + next_stmt); + + swap_ssa_operands (next_stmt, + gimple_assign_rhs1_ptr (next_stmt), + gimple_assign_rhs2_ptr (next_stmt)); + update_stmt (next_stmt); + + if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (gimple_assign_rhs1 (next_stmt))) + LOOP_VINFO_OPERANDS_SWAPPED (loop_info) = true; + } + else + return false; + } + + lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (next_stmt); + } + + /* Build up the actual chain. */ + for (unsigned i = 0; i < reduc_chain.length () - 1; ++i) + { + REDUC_GROUP_FIRST_ELEMENT (reduc_chain[i]) = reduc_chain[0]; + REDUC_GROUP_NEXT_ELEMENT (reduc_chain[i]) = reduc_chain[i+1]; + } + REDUC_GROUP_FIRST_ELEMENT (reduc_chain.last ()) = reduc_chain[0]; + REDUC_GROUP_NEXT_ELEMENT (reduc_chain.last ()) = NULL; + + /* Save the chain for further analysis in SLP detection. */ + LOOP_VINFO_REDUCTION_CHAINS (loop_info).safe_push (reduc_chain[0]); + REDUC_GROUP_SIZE (reduc_chain[0]) = size; + + return true; +} + +/* Return true if we need an in-order reduction for operation CODE + on type TYPE. NEED_WRAPPING_INTEGRAL_OVERFLOW is true if integer + overflow must wrap. */ + +static bool +parloops_needs_fold_left_reduction_p (tree type, tree_code code, + bool need_wrapping_integral_overflow) +{ + /* CHECKME: check for !flag_finite_math_only too? */ + if (SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (type)) + switch (code) + { + case MIN_EXPR: + case MAX_EXPR: + return false; + + default: + return !flag_associative_math; + } + + if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)) + { + if (!operation_no_trapping_overflow (type, code)) + return true; + if (need_wrapping_integral_overflow + && !TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type) + && operation_can_overflow (code)) + return true; + return false; + } + + if (SAT_FIXED_POINT_TYPE_P (type)) + return true; + + return false; +} + + +/* Function parloops_is_simple_reduction + + (1) Detect a cross-iteration def-use cycle that represents a simple + reduction computation. We look for the following pattern: + + loop_header: + a1 = phi < a0, a2 > + a3 = ... + a2 = operation (a3, a1) + + or + + a3 = ... + loop_header: + a1 = phi < a0, a2 > + a2 = operation (a3, a1) + + such that: + 1. operation is commutative and associative and it is safe to + change the order of the computation + 2. no uses for a2 in the loop (a2 is used out of the loop) + 3. no uses of a1 in the loop besides the reduction operation + 4. no uses of a1 outside the loop. + + Conditions 1,4 are tested here. + Conditions 2,3 are tested in vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized. + + (2) Detect a cross-iteration def-use cycle in nested loops, i.e., + nested cycles. + + (3) Detect cycles of phi nodes in outer-loop vectorization, i.e., double + reductions: + + a1 = phi < a0, a2 > + inner loop (def of a3) + a2 = phi < a3 > + + (4) Detect condition expressions, ie: + for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) + if (a[i] < val) + ret_val = a[i]; + +*/ + +static stmt_vec_info +parloops_is_simple_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_info, stmt_vec_info phi_info, + bool *double_reduc, + bool need_wrapping_integral_overflow, + enum vect_reduction_type *v_reduc_type) +{ + gphi *phi = as_a (phi_info->stmt); + class loop *loop = (gimple_bb (phi))->loop_father; + class loop *vect_loop = LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_info); + bool nested_in_vect_loop = flow_loop_nested_p (vect_loop, loop); + gimple *phi_use_stmt = NULL; + enum tree_code orig_code, code; + tree op1, op2, op3 = NULL_TREE, op4 = NULL_TREE; + tree type; + tree name; + imm_use_iterator imm_iter; + use_operand_p use_p; + bool phi_def; + + *double_reduc = false; + *v_reduc_type = TREE_CODE_REDUCTION; + + tree phi_name = PHI_RESULT (phi); + /* ??? If there are no uses of the PHI result the inner loop reduction + won't be detected as possibly double-reduction by vectorizable_reduction + because that tries to walk the PHI arg from the preheader edge which + can be constant. See PR60382. */ + if (has_zero_uses (phi_name)) + return NULL; + unsigned nphi_def_loop_uses = 0; + FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, imm_iter, phi_name) + { + gimple *use_stmt = USE_STMT (use_p); + if (is_gimple_debug (use_stmt)) + continue; + + if (!flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (use_stmt))) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location, + "intermediate value used outside loop.\n"); + + return NULL; + } + + nphi_def_loop_uses++; + phi_use_stmt = use_stmt; + } + + edge latch_e = loop_latch_edge (loop); + tree loop_arg = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, latch_e); + if (TREE_CODE (loop_arg) != SSA_NAME) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location, + "reduction: not ssa_name: %T\n", loop_arg); + return NULL; + } + + stmt_vec_info def_stmt_info = loop_info->lookup_def (loop_arg); + if (!def_stmt_info + || !flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def_stmt_info->stmt))) + return NULL; + + if (gassign *def_stmt = dyn_cast (def_stmt_info->stmt)) + { + name = gimple_assign_lhs (def_stmt); + phi_def = false; + } + else if (gphi *def_stmt = dyn_cast (def_stmt_info->stmt)) + { + name = PHI_RESULT (def_stmt); + phi_def = true; + } + else + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location, + "reduction: unhandled reduction operation: %G", + def_stmt_info->stmt); + return NULL; + } + + unsigned nlatch_def_loop_uses = 0; + auto_vec lcphis; + bool inner_loop_of_double_reduc = false; + FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, imm_iter, name) + { + gimple *use_stmt = USE_STMT (use_p); + if (is_gimple_debug (use_stmt)) + continue; + if (flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (use_stmt))) + nlatch_def_loop_uses++; + else + { + /* We can have more than one loop-closed PHI. */ + lcphis.safe_push (as_a (use_stmt)); + if (nested_in_vect_loop + && (STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (loop_info->lookup_stmt (use_stmt)) + == vect_double_reduction_def)) + inner_loop_of_double_reduc = true; + } + } + + /* If this isn't a nested cycle or if the nested cycle reduction value + is used ouside of the inner loop we cannot handle uses of the reduction + value. */ + if ((!nested_in_vect_loop || inner_loop_of_double_reduc) + && (nlatch_def_loop_uses > 1 || nphi_def_loop_uses > 1)) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location, + "reduction used in loop.\n"); + return NULL; + } + + /* If DEF_STMT is a phi node itself, we expect it to have a single argument + defined in the inner loop. */ + if (phi_def) + { + gphi *def_stmt = as_a (def_stmt_info->stmt); + op1 = PHI_ARG_DEF (def_stmt, 0); + + if (gimple_phi_num_args (def_stmt) != 1 + || TREE_CODE (op1) != SSA_NAME) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location, + "unsupported phi node definition.\n"); + + return NULL; + } + + gimple *def1 = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (op1); + if (gimple_bb (def1) + && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def_stmt)) + && loop->inner + && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop->inner, gimple_bb (def1)) + && is_gimple_assign (def1) + && is_a (phi_use_stmt) + && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop->inner, gimple_bb (phi_use_stmt))) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, + "detected double reduction: "); + + *double_reduc = true; + return def_stmt_info; + } + + return NULL; + } + + /* If we are vectorizing an inner reduction we are executing that + in the original order only in case we are not dealing with a + double reduction. */ + bool check_reduction = true; + if (flow_loop_nested_p (vect_loop, loop)) + { + gphi *lcphi; + unsigned i; + check_reduction = false; + FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (lcphis, i, lcphi) + FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, imm_iter, gimple_phi_result (lcphi)) + { + gimple *use_stmt = USE_STMT (use_p); + if (is_gimple_debug (use_stmt)) + continue; + if (! flow_bb_inside_loop_p (vect_loop, gimple_bb (use_stmt))) + check_reduction = true; + } + } + + gassign *def_stmt = as_a (def_stmt_info->stmt); + code = orig_code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt); + + if (nested_in_vect_loop && !check_reduction) + { + /* FIXME: Even for non-reductions code generation is funneled + through vectorizable_reduction for the stmt defining the + PHI latch value. So we have to artificially restrict ourselves + for the supported operations. */ + switch (get_gimple_rhs_class (code)) + { + case GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS: + case GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS: + break; + default: + /* Not supported by vectorizable_reduction. */ + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, def_stmt, + "nested cycle: not handled operation: "); + return NULL; + } + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, "detected nested cycle: "); + return def_stmt_info; + } + + /* We can handle "res -= x[i]", which is non-associative by + simply rewriting this into "res += -x[i]". Avoid changing + gimple instruction for the first simple tests and only do this + if we're allowed to change code at all. */ + if (code == MINUS_EXPR && gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt) != phi_name) + code = PLUS_EXPR; + + if (code == COND_EXPR) + { + if (! nested_in_vect_loop) + *v_reduc_type = COND_REDUCTION; + + op3 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt); + if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (op3)) + { + op4 = TREE_OPERAND (op3, 1); + op3 = TREE_OPERAND (op3, 0); + } + if (op3 == phi_name || op4 == phi_name) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, def_stmt, + "reduction: condition depends on previous" + " iteration: "); + return NULL; + } + + op1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt); + op2 = gimple_assign_rhs3 (def_stmt); + } + else if (!commutative_tree_code (code) || !associative_tree_code (code)) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, def_stmt, + "reduction: not commutative/associative: "); + return NULL; + } + else if (get_gimple_rhs_class (code) == GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS) + { + op1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt); + op2 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt); + } + else + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, def_stmt, + "reduction: not handled operation: "); + return NULL; + } + + if (TREE_CODE (op1) != SSA_NAME && TREE_CODE (op2) != SSA_NAME) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, def_stmt, + "reduction: both uses not ssa_names: "); + + return NULL; + } + + type = TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_lhs (def_stmt)); + if ((TREE_CODE (op1) == SSA_NAME + && !types_compatible_p (type,TREE_TYPE (op1))) + || (TREE_CODE (op2) == SSA_NAME + && !types_compatible_p (type, TREE_TYPE (op2))) + || (op3 && TREE_CODE (op3) == SSA_NAME + && !types_compatible_p (type, TREE_TYPE (op3))) + || (op4 && TREE_CODE (op4) == SSA_NAME + && !types_compatible_p (type, TREE_TYPE (op4)))) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + { + dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, + "reduction: multiple types: operation type: " + "%T, operands types: %T,%T", + type, TREE_TYPE (op1), TREE_TYPE (op2)); + if (op3) + dump_printf (MSG_NOTE, ",%T", TREE_TYPE (op3)); + + if (op4) + dump_printf (MSG_NOTE, ",%T", TREE_TYPE (op4)); + dump_printf (MSG_NOTE, "\n"); + } + + return NULL; + } + + /* Check whether it's ok to change the order of the computation. + Generally, when vectorizing a reduction we change the order of the + computation. This may change the behavior of the program in some + cases, so we need to check that this is ok. One exception is when + vectorizing an outer-loop: the inner-loop is executed sequentially, + and therefore vectorizing reductions in the inner-loop during + outer-loop vectorization is safe. */ + if (check_reduction + && *v_reduc_type == TREE_CODE_REDUCTION + && parloops_needs_fold_left_reduction_p (type, code, + need_wrapping_integral_overflow)) + *v_reduc_type = FOLD_LEFT_REDUCTION; + + /* Reduction is safe. We're dealing with one of the following: + 1) integer arithmetic and no trapv + 2) floating point arithmetic, and special flags permit this optimization + 3) nested cycle (i.e., outer loop vectorization). */ + stmt_vec_info def1_info = loop_info->lookup_def (op1); + stmt_vec_info def2_info = loop_info->lookup_def (op2); + if (code != COND_EXPR && !def1_info && !def2_info) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, + "reduction: no defs for operands: "); + return NULL; + } + + /* Check that one def is the reduction def, defined by PHI, + the other def is either defined in the loop ("vect_internal_def"), + or it's an induction (defined by a loop-header phi-node). */ + + if (def2_info + && def2_info->stmt == phi + && (code == COND_EXPR + || !def1_info + || !flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def1_info->stmt)) + || parloops_valid_reduction_input_p (def1_info))) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, "detected reduction: "); + return def_stmt_info; + } + + if (def1_info + && def1_info->stmt == phi + && (code == COND_EXPR + || !def2_info + || !flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def2_info->stmt)) + || parloops_valid_reduction_input_p (def2_info))) + { + if (! nested_in_vect_loop && orig_code != MINUS_EXPR) + { + /* Check if we can swap operands (just for simplicity - so that + the rest of the code can assume that the reduction variable + is always the last (second) argument). */ + if (code == COND_EXPR) + { + /* Swap cond_expr by inverting the condition. */ + tree cond_expr = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt); + enum tree_code invert_code = ERROR_MARK; + enum tree_code cond_code = TREE_CODE (cond_expr); + + if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (cond_code) == tcc_comparison) + { + bool honor_nans = HONOR_NANS (TREE_OPERAND (cond_expr, 0)); + invert_code = invert_tree_comparison (cond_code, honor_nans); + } + if (invert_code != ERROR_MARK) + { + TREE_SET_CODE (cond_expr, invert_code); + swap_ssa_operands (def_stmt, + gimple_assign_rhs2_ptr (def_stmt), + gimple_assign_rhs3_ptr (def_stmt)); + } + else + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, + "detected reduction: cannot swap operands " + "for cond_expr"); + return NULL; + } + } + else + swap_ssa_operands (def_stmt, gimple_assign_rhs1_ptr (def_stmt), + gimple_assign_rhs2_ptr (def_stmt)); + + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, + "detected reduction: need to swap operands: "); + + if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt))) + LOOP_VINFO_OPERANDS_SWAPPED (loop_info) = true; + } + else + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, "detected reduction: "); + } + + return def_stmt_info; + } + + /* Try to find SLP reduction chain. */ + if (! nested_in_vect_loop + && code != COND_EXPR + && orig_code != MINUS_EXPR + && parloops_is_slp_reduction (loop_info, phi, def_stmt)) + { + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + report_ploop_op (MSG_NOTE, def_stmt, + "reduction: detected reduction chain: "); + + return def_stmt_info; + } + + /* Look for the expression computing loop_arg from loop PHI result. */ + if (check_reduction_path (vect_location, loop, phi, loop_arg, code)) + return def_stmt_info; + + if (dump_enabled_p ()) + { + report_ploop_op (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, def_stmt, + "reduction: unknown pattern: "); + } + + return NULL; +} + +/* Wrapper around vect_is_simple_reduction, which will modify code + in-place if it enables detection of more reductions. Arguments + as there. */ + +stmt_vec_info +parloops_force_simple_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_info, stmt_vec_info phi_info, + bool *double_reduc, + bool need_wrapping_integral_overflow) +{ + enum vect_reduction_type v_reduc_type; + stmt_vec_info def_info + = parloops_is_simple_reduction (loop_info, phi_info, double_reduc, + need_wrapping_integral_overflow, + &v_reduc_type); + if (def_info) + { + STMT_VINFO_REDUC_TYPE (phi_info) = v_reduc_type; + STMT_VINFO_REDUC_DEF (phi_info) = def_info; + STMT_VINFO_REDUC_TYPE (def_info) = v_reduc_type; + STMT_VINFO_REDUC_DEF (def_info) = phi_info; + } + return def_info; +} + /* Minimal number of iterations of a loop that should be executed in each thread. */ #define MIN_PER_THREAD PARAM_VALUE (PARAM_PARLOOPS_MIN_PER_THREAD) @@ -2615,9 +3327,9 @@ gather_scalar_reductions (loop_p loop, reduction_info_table_type *reduction_list continue; stmt_vec_info reduc_stmt_info - = vect_force_simple_reduction (simple_loop_info, - simple_loop_info->lookup_stmt (phi), - &double_reduc, true); + = parloops_force_simple_reduction (simple_loop_info, + simple_loop_info->lookup_stmt (phi), + &double_reduc, true); if (!reduc_stmt_info || !valid_reduction_p (reduc_stmt_info)) continue; @@ -2664,9 +3376,9 @@ gather_scalar_reductions (loop_p loop, reduction_info_table_type *reduction_list stmt_vec_info inner_phi_info = simple_loop_info->lookup_stmt (inner_phi); stmt_vec_info inner_reduc_stmt_info - = vect_force_simple_reduction (simple_loop_info, - inner_phi_info, - &double_reduc, true); + = parloops_force_simple_reduction (simple_loop_info, + inner_phi_info, + &double_reduc, true); gcc_assert (!double_reduc); if (!inner_reduc_stmt_info || !valid_reduction_p (inner_reduc_stmt_info)) -- cgit v1.2.3