| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Summary:
The implementation, however, is in different arch-specific files, unless it's emulated.
Reviewers: dberris, pelikan, javed.absar
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29796
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk@294777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Summary:
As pointed out in casual reading of the XRay codebase, that we had
some interesting named functions that didn't quite follow the LLVM coding
conventions.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29625
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk@294373 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk@293015 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This reverts rL290852 as it breaks aarch64 and arm.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk@290854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk@290852 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
