summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_libcdep.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>2017-08-01 21:15:19 +0000
committerVitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>2017-08-01 21:15:19 +0000
commitc6c5f9c9c5579d6b5f38c0aa03cf5f135bf1ec1a (patch)
tree41a8c74dfda52f45459b1b26375f8d12c998b441 /lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_libcdep.cc
parentba0e4f947e27ade26d7c572e04daca89f3f309fc (diff)
[sanitizer_common] Fuchsia support for interceptors
Summary: Actually Fuchsia non-support for interceptors. Fuchsia doesn't use interceptors in the common sense at all. Almost all system library functions don't need interception at all, because the system libraries are just themselves compiled with sanitizers enabled and have specific hook interfaces where needed to inform the sanitizer runtime about thread lifetimes and the like. For the few functions that do get intercepted, they don't use a generic mechanism like dlsym with RTLD_NEXT to find the underlying system library function. Instead, they use specific extra symbol names published by the system library (e.g. __unsanitized_memcpy). Submitted on behalf of Roland McGrath. Reviewers: vitalybuka, alekseyshl, kcc, filcab Reviewed By: filcab Subscribers: kubamracek, phosek, filcab, llvm-commits Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36028 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk@309745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_libcdep.cc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions