PR32010: Fix template argument depth mixup when forming implicit constructor

template deduction guides for class template argument deduction.

Ensure that we have a local instantiation scope for tracking the instantiated
parameters. Additionally, unusually, we're substituting at depth 1 and leaving
depth 0 alone; make sure that we don't reduce template parameter depth by 2 for
inner parameters in the process. (This is probably also broken for alias
templates in the case where they're expanded within a dependent context, but
this patch doesn't fix that.)


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@295696 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/deduction.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/deduction.cpp
index 16e01a9346..a1180f0988 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/deduction.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/deduction.cpp
@@ -481,3 +481,16 @@ namespace check_extended_pack {
   int n;
   void h() { g<0>(Y<0, &n>()); } // expected-error {{no matching function}}
 }
+
+namespace dependent_template_template_param_non_type_param_type {
+  template<int N> struct A { // expected-note 2{{candidate}}
+    template<typename V = int, V M = 12, V (*Y)[M], template<V (*v)[M]> class W>
+    A(W<Y>); // expected-note {{[with V = int, M = 12, Y = &dependent_template_template_param_non_type_param_type::n]}}
+  };
+
+  int n[12];
+  template<int (*)[12]> struct Q {};
+  Q<&n> qn;
+  // FIXME: This should be accepted, but we somehow fail to deduce W.
+  A<0> a(qn); // expected-error {{no matching constructor for initialization}}
+}