summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/SemaTemplate
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-05-10 02:30:28 +0000
committerRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-05-10 02:30:28 +0000
commit327d010bc81cbf3656ac46faa24109c7c0f1f624 (patch)
treeb6292a2f16a0af6092b43e70dc3506e81fd07c12 /test/SemaTemplate
parent23f58ce5d2805d7f2fb9818f04cb7541319a5307 (diff)
When we see a '<' operator, check whether it's a probable typo for a template-id.
The heuristic that we use here is: * the left-hand side must be a simple identifier or a class member access * the right-hand side must be '<' followed by either a '>' or by a type-id that cannot be an expression (in particular, not followed by '(' or '{') * there is a '>' token matching the '<' token The second condition guarantees the expression would otherwise be ill-formed. If we're confident that the user intended the name before the '<' to be interpreted as a template, diagnose the fact that we didn't interpret it that way, rather than diagnosing that the template arguments are not valid expressions. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@302615 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/SemaTemplate')
-rw-r--r--test/SemaTemplate/typo-template-name.cpp43
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/typo-template-name.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/typo-template-name.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..fe5201a8e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/typo-template-name.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z %s -verify -Wno-unused
+
+namespace InExpr {
+ namespace A {
+ void typo_first_a(); // expected-note {{found}}
+ template<typename T> void typo_first_b(); // expected-note 2{{declared here}}
+ }
+ void testA() { A::typo_first_a<int>(); } // expected-error {{'typo_first_a' does not name a template but is followed by template arguments; did you mean 'typo_first_b'?}}
+
+ namespace B {
+ void typo_first_b(); // expected-note {{found}}
+ }
+ void testB() { B::typo_first_b<int>(); } // expected-error {{'typo_first_b' does not name a template but is followed by template arguments; did you mean 'A::typo_first_b'?}}
+
+ struct Base {
+ template<typename T> static void foo(); // expected-note 4{{declared here}}
+ int n;
+ };
+ struct Derived : Base {
+ void foo(); // expected-note {{found}}
+ };
+ // We probably don't want to suggest correcting to .Base::foo<int>
+ void testMember() { Derived().foo<int>(); } // expected-error-re {{does not name a template but is followed by template arguments{{$}}}}
+
+ struct Derived2 : Base {
+ void goo(); // expected-note {{found}}
+ };
+ void testMember2() { Derived2().goo<int>(); } // expected-error {{member 'goo' of 'InExpr::Derived2' is not a template; did you mean 'foo'?}}
+
+ void no_correction() {
+ int foo; // expected-note 3{{found}}
+
+ foo<int>(); // expected-error {{'foo' does not name a template but is followed by template arguments; did you mean 'Base::foo'?}}
+ foo<>(); // expected-error {{'foo' does not name a template but is followed by template arguments; did you mean 'Base::foo'?}}
+ foo<Base *>(); // expected-error {{'foo' does not name a template but is followed by template arguments; did you mean 'Base::foo'?}}
+
+ // These are valid expressions.
+ foo<foo; // expected-warning {{self-comparison}}
+ foo<int()>(0);
+ foo<int(), true>(false);
+ foo<Base{}.n;
+ }
+}