summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/SemaCXX
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorErich Keane <erich.keane@intel.com>2017-11-30 16:37:02 +0000
committerErich Keane <erich.keane@intel.com>2017-11-30 16:37:02 +0000
commitc48afae870f98e8b0a4e519344d47e10427ab7d1 (patch)
tree463aaec01a8e3fb23690cbd1c26b331f42583c87 /test/SemaCXX
parent96c9689f478d292390b76efcea35d87cbad3f44d (diff)
Fix __has_unique_object_representations implementation
As rsmith pointed out, the original implementation of this intrinsic missed a number of important situations. This patch fixe a bunch of shortcomings and implementation details to make it work correctly. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39347 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@319446 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/SemaCXX')
-rw-r--r--test/SemaCXX/has_unique_object_reps_member_ptr.cpp32
-rw-r--r--test/SemaCXX/type-traits.cpp86
2 files changed, 113 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/has_unique_object_reps_member_ptr.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/has_unique_object_reps_member_ptr.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b8e27f82ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/has_unique_object_reps_member_ptr.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-pc -DIS64 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-windows-pc -DIS64 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-linux-pc -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-windows-pc -DW32 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+struct Base {};
+struct A : virtual Base {
+ virtual void n() {}
+};
+
+auto p = &A::n;
+static_assert(__has_unique_object_representations(decltype(p)));
+
+struct B {
+ decltype(p) x;
+ int b;
+#ifdef IS64
+ // required on 64 bit to fill out the tail padding.
+ int c;
+#endif
+};
+static_assert(__has_unique_object_representations(B));
+
+struct C { // has padding on Win32, but nothing else.
+ decltype(p) x;
+};
+#ifdef W32
+static_assert(!__has_unique_object_representations(C));
+#else
+static_assert(__has_unique_object_representations(C));
+#endif
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/type-traits.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/type-traits.cpp
index d6a3574f93..d4d1968218 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/type-traits.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/type-traits.cpp
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ struct Padding {
int b;
};
-static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<Padding>::value, "but not with padding");
+//static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<Padding>::value, "but not with padding");
struct InheritsFromPadding : Padding {
int c;
@@ -2518,12 +2518,11 @@ enum class LLEnumClass : long long { xLongExample,
static_assert(has_unique_object_representations<ExampleEnumClass>::value, "Enums are integrals, so unique!");
static_assert(has_unique_object_representations<LLEnumClass>::value, "Enums are integrals, so unique!");
-// because reference types aren't object types
+// because references aren't trivially copyable.
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<int &>::value, "No references!");
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<const int &>::value, "No references!");
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<volatile int &>::value, "No references!");
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<const volatile int &>::value, "No references!");
-
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<Empty>::value, "No empty types!");
class Compressed : Empty {
@@ -2556,6 +2555,16 @@ static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<double[42]>::value, "So no arra
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<double[]>::value, "So no array of doubles!");
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<double[][42]>::value, "So no array of doubles!");
+struct __attribute__((aligned(16))) WeirdAlignment {
+ int i;
+};
+union __attribute__((aligned(16))) WeirdAlignmentUnion {
+ int i;
+};
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<WeirdAlignment>::value, "Alignment causes padding");
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<WeirdAlignmentUnion>::value, "Alignment causes padding");
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<WeirdAlignment[42]>::value, "Also no arrays that have padding");
+
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<int(int)>::value, "Functions are not unique");
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<int(int) const>::value, "Functions are not unique");
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<int(int) volatile>::value, "Functions are not unique");
@@ -2582,6 +2591,73 @@ static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<int(int, ...) const &&>::value,
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<int(int, ...) volatile &&>::value, "Functions are not unique");
static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<int(int, ...) const volatile &&>::value, "Functions are not unique");
-static auto lambda = []() {};
-static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<decltype(lambda)>::value, "Lambdas are not unique");
+void foo(){
+ static auto lambda = []() {};
+ static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<decltype(lambda)>::value, "Lambdas follow struct rules");
+ int i;
+ static auto lambda2 = [i]() {};
+ static_assert(has_unique_object_representations<decltype(lambda2)>::value, "Lambdas follow struct rules");
+}
+
+struct PaddedBitfield {
+ char c : 6;
+ char d : 1;
+};
+
+struct UnPaddedBitfield {
+ char c : 6;
+ char d : 2;
+};
+
+struct AlignedPaddedBitfield {
+ char c : 6;
+ __attribute__((aligned(1)))
+ char d : 2;
+};
+
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<PaddedBitfield>::value, "Bitfield padding");
+static_assert(has_unique_object_representations<UnPaddedBitfield>::value, "Bitfield padding");
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<AlignedPaddedBitfield>::value, "Bitfield padding");
+
+struct BoolBitfield {
+ bool b : 8;
+};
+
+static_assert(has_unique_object_representations<BoolBitfield>::value, "Bitfield bool");
+
+struct BoolBitfield2 {
+ bool b : 16;
+};
+
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<BoolBitfield2>::value, "Bitfield bool");
+
+struct GreaterSizeBitfield {
+ //expected-warning@+1 {{width of bit-field 'n'}}
+ int n : 1024;
+};
+
+static_assert(sizeof(GreaterSizeBitfield) == 128, "Bitfield Size");
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<GreaterSizeBitfield>::value, "Bitfield padding");
+
+struct StructWithRef {
+ int &I;
+};
+
+static_assert(has_unique_object_representations<StructWithRef>::value, "References are still unique");
+
+struct NotUniqueBecauseTailPadding {
+ int &r;
+ char a;
+};
+struct CanBeUniqueIfNoPadding : NotUniqueBecauseTailPadding {
+ char b[7];
+};
+
+static_assert(!has_unique_object_representations<NotUniqueBecauseTailPadding>::value,
+ "non trivial");
+// Can be unique on Itanium, since the is child class' data is 'folded' into the
+// parent's tail padding.
+static_assert(sizeof(CanBeUniqueIfNoPadding) != 16 ||
+ has_unique_object_representations<CanBeUniqueIfNoPadding>::value,
+ "inherit from std layout");