Merging r321933:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r321933 | xazax | 2018-01-06 02:51:00 -0800 (Sat, 06 Jan 2018) | 4 lines

[analyzer] Fix some check's output plist not containing the check name

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41538

------------------------------------------------------------------------


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_60@322550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

2 files changed, 17 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
index 851114004b..904c9ffa37 100644
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
@@ -2900,8 +2900,13 @@ void ento::registerNewDeleteLeaksChecker(CheckerManager &mgr) {
       mgr.getCurrentCheckName();
   // We currently treat NewDeleteLeaks checker as a subchecker of NewDelete
   // checker.
-  if (!checker->ChecksEnabled[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker])
+  if (!checker->ChecksEnabled[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker]) {
     checker->ChecksEnabled[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker] = true;
+    // FIXME: This does not set the correct name, but without this workaround
+    //        no name will be set at all.
+    checker->CheckNames[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker] =
+        mgr.getCurrentCheckName();
+  }
 }
 
 #define REGISTER_CHECKER(name)                                                 \
diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp
index 06c4ef71d8..1ebac2118a 100644
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ private:
                                  CheckerContext &C) const;
   void reportLeakedVALists(const RegionVector &LeakedVALists, StringRef Msg1,
                            StringRef Msg2, CheckerContext &C, ExplodedNode *N,
-                           bool ForceReport = false) const;
+                           bool ReportUninit = false) const;
 
   void checkVAListStartCall(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C,
                             bool IsCopy) const;
@@ -267,15 +267,19 @@ void ValistChecker::reportUninitializedAccess(const MemRegion *VAList,
 void ValistChecker::reportLeakedVALists(const RegionVector &LeakedVALists,
                                         StringRef Msg1, StringRef Msg2,
                                         CheckerContext &C, ExplodedNode *N,
-                                        bool ForceReport) const {
+                                        bool ReportUninit) const {
   if (!(ChecksEnabled[CK_Unterminated] ||
-        (ChecksEnabled[CK_Uninitialized] && ForceReport)))
+        (ChecksEnabled[CK_Uninitialized] && ReportUninit)))
     return;
   for (auto Reg : LeakedVALists) {
     if (!BT_leakedvalist) {
-      BT_leakedvalist.reset(new BugType(CheckNames[CK_Unterminated],
-                                        "Leaked va_list",
-                                        categories::MemoryError));
+      // FIXME: maybe creating a new check name for this type of bug is a better
+      // solution.
+      BT_leakedvalist.reset(
+          new BugType(CheckNames[CK_Unterminated].getName().empty()
+                          ? CheckNames[CK_Uninitialized]
+                          : CheckNames[CK_Unterminated],
+                      "Leaked va_list", categories::MemoryError));
       BT_leakedvalist->setSuppressOnSink(true);
     }
 
@@ -375,7 +379,7 @@ void ValistChecker::checkVAListEndCall(const CallEvent &Call,
 
 std::shared_ptr<PathDiagnosticPiece> ValistChecker::ValistBugVisitor::VisitNode(
     const ExplodedNode *N, const ExplodedNode *PrevN, BugReporterContext &BRC,
-    BugReport &BR) {
+    BugReport &) {
   ProgramStateRef State = N->getState();
   ProgramStateRef StatePrev = PrevN->getState();